To: Sonoma County Board of Supervisors
Department or Agency Name(s): Permit and Resource Management
Staff Name and Phone Number: Gary O’Connor, 707-565-4448
Vote Requirement: Majority
Supervisorial District(s): Fifth
Title:
Title
1:30 PM -Right-of-Way Vacation for a portion of Redwood Drive in Monte Rio; RWV20-0002
End
Recommended Action:
Recommended action
After close of public hearing, adopt a resolution (1) finding that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and (2) ordering vacation of a ‘lane’ located off Redwood Drive as shown and dedicated to the public and accepted on the amended map of “Subdivision No. 1 of Rio Campo” filed in Book 27 of Maps, Page 13, Sonoma County Records, on June 27, 1927. (Fifth District)
end
Executive Summary:
The application is a petition to vacate (permanently abandon), the public right-of-way in a ‘lane’ located off Redwood Drive. Approval of the resolution would authorize the vacation subject to specified conditions. The vacation would be complete when the conditions are satisfied and County staff has recorded the Resolution.
Discussion:
Permit and Resource Management Department (Permit Sonoma) received petitioner James Patrick Gaffey’s petition for Vacation of Public Easement/Public Right-of-Way (Petition) on March 16, 2020. The Petition requests that the Board vacate a portion of Redwood Drive, a 5 feet wide lane public right-of-way (Vacation Petition Area) that is adjacent to two parcels, APN 094-150-038 and APN 094-250-057. Exhibits A and B respectively, are general and specific location maps of the Vacation Petition Area which is near Monte Rio. The subject portion of Redwood Drive requested to be vacated was created on June 30, 1927 by a Grant Deed, however the Vacation Petition Area is not maintained by the County and not accessible to the public.
The narrow lane of the subject portion of Redwood Drive was intended to provide public access to the Russian River but has been unused for many years and there is no physical trail or evidence of such. This ‘lane’ no longer reaches the Russian River.
Vacation is the complete or partial abandonment of the public right to use a street or public service easement. Under State statutes and applicable case law, the Board may vacate any public street, highway, lane or public service easement within its jurisdiction, provided the Board makes the following findings: (1) the interest proposed to be vacated is unnecessary for present or prospective public use; (2) the proposed vacation is in the public interest; (3) the proposed vacation is consistent with the General Plan; and (4) the road proposed for vacation is not useful as a non-motorized transportation facility (bike trail).
County survey staff reviewed public records and the materials submitted on behalf of petitioner to determine the nature of the County’s interest in the Vacation Petition Area. Staff verified that the County has a public right-of-way interest in the Vacation Petition Area. Staff determined that the relevant segment of Redwood Drive (Vacation Petition Area) was not being used by the public and there is no prospective public use. The County abandoned maintenance of the subject portion of the right-of-way that is subject to be vacated by the Board.
Permit Sonoma Comprehensive Planning Division staff conducted a field review to verify the facts presented in the petition. Staff did not observe any present public use of the Vacation Petition Area.
Comprehensive Planning Division staff also prepared a General Plan Consistency Analysis, as required by Streets and Highways Code Section 8313 and Government Code Section 65402, and determined that the proposed vacation is consistent with the General Plan and with the County’s Complete Streets Policy.
Survey Staff referred the Petition to all County Departments and Public Agencies with a potential interest in the Vacation Petition Area, including the Department of Transportation and Public Works, Emergency Services, Law Enforcement, and Sonoma Water. Staff did not receive any objections.
Staff notified all public and private utilities with potential interest in the Vacation Petition Area. Staff did not receive any objections.
Notice was given to all owners of neighboring parcels located within 350 feet of the parcels containing the Vacation Petition Area. Staff did not receive any objections.
Staff determined that the proposed general vacation is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the “general rule” of CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), which provides that CEQA applies only to projects that have potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The proposed vacation would merely terminate a “paper street” that was never used by the public. No change in the existing use of the Vacation Petition Area is proposed. There is no possibility that the proposed vacation may have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore the project is exempt from CEQA.
Staff concludes that the Board may make all of the required findings to approve the Petition. The Vacation Petition Area has never been used as a public right-of-way and there is no intended plan to use the Vacation Petition Area as a public right-of-way. The requested vacation is consistent with the General Plan, it is not part of a street grid, does not connect to arterial streets and is not near parks, schools, or other public uses. Granting the vacation will serve the public interest by returning land not needed for public use to private ownership, thereby eliminating any potential County liability related to the subject portion of Redwood Drive right-of-way.
Based on these factors, staff recommends the Board adopt the Resolution ordering the vacation.
Strategic Plan:
Not Applicable
Prior Board Actions:
Not Applicable
Fiscal Summary
Narrative Explanation of Fiscal Impacts:
Not Applicable
Narrative Explanation of Staffing Impacts (If Required):
Not Applicable
Attachments:
Attachment 1: Exhibit A
Attachment 2: Exhibit B
Attachment 3: Board Resolution
Attachment 4: Resolution Exhibit A
Attachment 5: Resolution Exhibit B
Attachment 6: Staff PowerPoint
Related Items “On File” with the Clerk of the Board:
Not Applicable